Thursday, October 29, 2009

Health care legislation

I don’t know if I feel strongly that the U.S. Government should be responsible for providing healthcare for Americans. However, I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad idea. There are so many variables to consider with regard to this controversial topic. Where should the money come from to support it? What would this healthcare bill do to private insurance companies? How would providers be affected? Would Americans “abuse” the system? These are just a few of many that come to mind. There has been a final plan proposed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California that could be up for a vote on the House floor next week. The final proposal would require employers to offer insurance to employees or face penalties, provide subsidies to lower income families to help them purchase insurance and would fine Americans who do not elect coverage. Funding for this particular bill would come from taxing high-income people and cutting $500 billion in payments to Medicare providers (whom are already reimbursed at lower rates than they are by private insurances). Taxing the “rich” people? Sounds like a good idea to me (probably because I am not one of them). I think employers should be required to at least offer health insurance to employees. However, I think it’s terrible and ridiculous to fine Americans who don’t purchase coverage. That seems a little excessive. I feel there are times when a line has to be drawn and the government should mind their own business, this would be one of them. How are they going to require people to purchase some sort of insurance? That’s not practical. I hate to sound cliché but you can’t squeeze blood out of a turnip. Despite all of the different variables that remain to be considered and ironed out, I think it’s a good idea for the government to offer Americans some sort of alternative to private healthcare.

1 comment:

  1. "Another look at Health Care"

    I recently read a blog titled “Health Care Legislation” posted by S. Williams at Proud to be an American. I found the post to be quite interesting. It was challenging to tell from the author’s opening sentences whether or not the author had a definitive opinion regarding the proposed health care reform legislation. The author supported this position of ambiguity by pointing out the various variables to consider and in his mind there were still too many unanswered questions.

    The post conveyed a stronger concern for the private insurance companies and employers than for the millions of American who have no hope of receiving and paying for quality health care. I’m sorry, but I have no empathy for the insurance companies that have for years made a hefty profit by draining the pocket of American families, leaving them still ill and in poverty.

    While there was some indecisiveness in the author’s view, he did take a strong position regarding the issues of fining Americans who don’t purchase coverage. To this though I would like to know how the author would feel if they were involved in an auto accident with a motorist who did not have government required auto insurance. Levying fines for the uninsured, which we have been doing for years, worked out favorably for all.

    In closing, the author appears to lean toward limited government involvement and states that “government should mind their own business.” That’s an interesting statement, considering that government is supposed to be in place to manage the issues of the people they have been elected to serve. I strongly support the government effort to reform our Health Care System.

    http://steeltalking.blogspot.com/2009/11/another-look-at-health-care.html

    ReplyDelete